Adams, Sarah E. (2020). How Single-Candidate Super PACs Changed the Game and How to Change it Back: Adopting a Presumption of Coordination and Fixing the FEC’s Gridlock. Brooklyn Law Review, 85(3), 851-881.
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C. & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. University of Chicago Press.
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2012). A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.
Perspectives on Politics,
10(3), 571–597.
https://doi:10.1017/S1537592712001624
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge University Press.
Bonica, A. & Rosenthal, H. (2015). The Wealth Elasticity of Political Contributions by the Forbes 400.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2668780
Bricker, B. (2017).
Citizens United and Political Accountability. Corruption, Accountability and Discretion. Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2053-769720170000029011
Briffault, R. (2012). Super PACs. Minnesota Law Review, 96(4), 1644–1693.
Dwyre, D. (2017).
Everything is Relative: Are Political Parties Playing a Meaningful Campaign Finance Role in U.S. Federal Elections?, The University of Akron.
https://www.uakron.edu/bliss/state-of-the-parties/papers/dwyre.pdf
Dwyre, D. (2017). Political Parties and Campaign Finance: What Role Do the National Parties Play?. Washington, D.C., April 21, 2017. Bipartisan Policy Center
Desmarais, B. A., La Raja, R. J. & Kowal, M. S. (2015). The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 194-211.
Dowling, C. M., & Wichowsky, A. (2015). Attacks without consequence? Candidates, parties, groups, and the changing face of negative advertising.
American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 19–36.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12127
Fishkin, J. & Gerken, H. (2015). The Party's Over: McCutcheon, Shadow Parties, and the Future of the Party System. Supreme Court Review, 2015(1).
Foy-Sutherland, G. & Ghosh, S. (2024). Coordination in Plain Sight: The Breadth and Uses of “Redboxing” in Congressional Elections.
Election Law Journal, 23(2), 149–172.
https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2023.0038
Frazen, A. (2021). How citizens united drastically changed the campaign finance reform landscape: implications for donor behavior, polarization, and transparency of political information.
Johns Hopkins University. August 2021.
https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/cef0359d-bb22-4fa2-83b9-13950c588866/content
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.
Hall, R. L., Deardorff, A. V. (2006). Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. The American Political Science Review, 100(1), 69-84.
Hasen, R. L. (2016). Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. Yale University Press.
Hertel-Fernandez, A., Skocpol, T. & Sclar, J. (2018). When Political Mega-Donors Join Forces: How the Koch Network and the Democracy Alliance Influence Organized U.S. Politics on the Right and Left. Studies in American Political Development, 32(2), 1-39. DOI:10.1017/S0898588X18000081
Issacharoff, S. & Karlan, P. (1999). The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform. Texas Law Review, vol. 77, 1705-1738.
Issacharoff, S. (2016). Outsourcing Politics: The Hostile Takeovers of Our Hollowed Out Political Parties. New York University School of Law, No. 16-52.
Kang, M. S. (2013). The Year of the Super PAC. The George Washington Law Review, 81(1902), 1902-1953.
Kalla, J. L. & Broockman, D. E. (2016). Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 545-558.
Kalla, J. L. & Broockman, D. E. (2018). The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General
Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 148-166.
Corrado, A. (2006). The Regulatory Environment: Uncertainty in the Wake of Change. In D. B. Magleby, A. Corrado, & K. D. Patterson, Financing the 2004 Election (pp. 30–67). Brookings Institution Press.
Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J. (1990). The money chase. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Martin, S. E., & Schatzinger, H. M. (2020). Game Changers: How Dark Money and Super PACs Are Transforming US Campaigns. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mayer, J. (2016). Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. Doubleday.
Oklobdzija, S. (2024). Dark Parties: Unveiling Nonparty Communities in American Political Campaigns.
American Political Science Review,
118(1), 401–422.
https://doi:10.1017/S0003055423000187
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45(4), 595-628.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). Policy Network Analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford university press. 425-447.
Sharma, S. (2021). Voters Need to Know: Assessing the Legality of Redboxing in Federal Elections. Yale Law Journal, 130(7), 1898–1951.
Shanor, A. (2016). The new Lochner.
Wisconsin Law Review, 2016(1), 133-208.
https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.2652762
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Skocpol, T. & Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2016). The Kock Network and Republican Party Extremism. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 681-699.
Smith, B. A. (2018). Campaign finance and free speech: finding the radicalism in Citizens united v. FEC. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 41(1), 139–151.
Afaneh, S. (2024).
Campaign Funding in US Elections. Fiker Institute. January, 2024.
https://www.fikerinstitute.org/publications/campaign-funding-in-us-elections
Barron’s. (2024).
The House Passed a Crypto Bill That’s Crucial for the Industry. Its Future Is Murky. May 22, 2024.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/bitcoin-crypto-bill-fit21-coinbase-stock-e0713031
Blockworks. (2024).
Senate passes resolution to overturn SAB 121. May 16, 2024.
https://blockworks.co/news/senate-passes-resolution-to-overturn-sab121
Campaign Legal Center. (2025, March 27).
Voters need to know: What is redboxing and how it undermines democracy. Campaign Legal Center.
https://campaignlegal.org/update/voters-need-know-what-redboxing-and-how-it-undermines-democracy
Congress of the U.S. (n.d).
Constitution of the United States.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/
DL News. (2024).
Why crypto’s Fairshake super PAC has raised 20% less money than people think. DL News.
https://www.dlnews.com/articles/regulation/why-super-pac-fairshake-has-less-money-than-people-think
Gordon, S. (2024).
Soft Money: What It Is, How It Works, and History. Investopedia.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/softmoney.asp
Open Secrets. (2012).
2012 Outside Spending by Single-Candidate Super PACs. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/single_candidate_super_pacs/2012
Open Secrets. (2016).
2016 Outside Spending by Single-Candidate Super PACs. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/single_candidate_super_pacs/2016
Open Secrets. (2020).
2020 Outside Spending by Single-Candidate Super PACs. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/single_candidate_super_pacs/2020
Open Secrets. (2022).
2022 Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/top_donors/2022?disp=O&type=V&superonly=S
Open Secrets. (2024).
2024 Outside Spending by Single-Candidate Super PACs. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/single_candidate_super_pacs/2020
Open Secrets. (2024).
2024 Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/top_donors/2024?disp=O&type=V&superonly=S
Open Secrets. (2025a).
Dark money basics. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/dark-money/basics
Open Secrets. (2025b).
Top Elections. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/dark-money/top-elections
Open Secrets. (n.d, a).
Total outside spending by election cycle. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/by_cycle
Open Secrets. (n.d, b). Outside spending by election cycle, excluding party committees. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/cycle-totals
Open Secrets. (n.d, c).
About Outside Spending. Center for Responsive Politics.
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending
The American Presidency Project. (n.d). Statement on Signing the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signing-the-federal-election-campaign-act-1971
Wesleyan Media Project. (2012).
Presidential Ads 70 Percent Negative in 2012, Up from 9 Percent in 2008.
https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/jump-in-negativity-2
Wesleyan Media Project. (2020).
Political Ads in 2020: Fast and Furious.
https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/2020-summary-032321
Wesleyan Media Project. (2024).
More Than $4.5 Billion in Ad Spending This Cycle.
https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases-103124
