Feasibility of establishing the hegemonic security model in the West Asian region in the post-American era; Existing obstacles and challenges (2001-2024)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master's degree in International Relations, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

The purpose of the current research is to investigate the possibility of establishing a hegemonic security model in the West Asia Region after the US attack on Afghanistan and Iraq and also after the developments of the Islamic awakening known as the Arab Spring in the Middle East. For this, the requirements of the security model of hegemony have been raised at the beginning. Things like internal dynamism, the desire to play a hegemonic role, regional leadership capacity and ability, high regional influence, the ability to deal with the coalition of other countries in the region, acceptance by other countries in the region and the potential ability to reach global power are among the most important requirements that regional countries must fulfill in order to reach the hegemonic stage. In order to measure these requirements for the powerful countries of the Middle East such as the Islamic Republic of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, this question has been raised Considering the security requirements of the hegemonic model, is it possible to establish this model in the West Asian region in the post-American era? According to the security requirements of the hegemonic model, the hypothesis is that the powerful countries of the Middle East do not have often these requirements, especially the ability to deal with the coalition of regional countries, acceptance by other members and the potential possibility of reaching global power. This article, using a descriptive-explanatory method, has investigated the hegemonic security model and its compliance with the conditions and status of the countries of the Middle East region. The results obtained by documentary method and descriptive-analytical approach indicate that although the countries of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have a high regional influence, this influence has faced the opposition and competition of other powers and therefore cannot be accepted by other countries. Also, in the event of a war, a single country does not have the ability to face a coalition of countries, besides these countries do not have the ability to become a world power. Therefore, the model of hegemony has little practicality in the West Asia.

Keywords

Smiley face

References

قنبرلو، عبدالله. (1388). مفهوم و ماهبت قدرت منطقه‌ای. مطالعات راهبردی، 12 (4)، 66-38.
Acharya, A. (2007). The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics. World Politics. 59 (4), 629-652.
Ahmad, A. (2012). Concept of National Power. Strategic Studies. 32 (2-3), 83-101.
Ahmed Anwer, M., Moorthy, R. (2019). Saudi-Iran Rivalry in the Middle East: Implication to National Security. e-BANGI: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 16 (1),1-13.
AL-Rasheed, M. (2006). 12 Saudi Arabia: The Challenge of the US Invasion of Iraq. In book: The Iraq War, Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515.
Altunışık, M. (2020). The New Turn in Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the Middle East: Regional and Domestic Insecurities. FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies. IAI 20, 1-22.
Arslan, İ. (2017). Iran’s Middle East Policy. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 16, 34-51.
Beck, M. (2014). The Concept of Regional Power as Applied to the Middle East. In: Furtig, H. (Ed.), Regional Powers in the Middle East: New Constellations After the Arab Revolts. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
Bekaroğlu, E. (2016). Justice and Development Party and Muslim Brotherhood in the “Arab Spring”: A Failed Post-Islamist Interaction to Transform the Middle East. PESA International Journal of Social Studies, 2 (1), 1-16.
Cerioli, L.G. (2018). Roles and International Behaviour: Saudi–Iranian Rivalry in Bahrain’s and Yemen’s Arab Spring. Contexto Internacional, 40 (2), 295-317.
Drakoularakos, S. (2021). Turkey, the Middle East and the EU Integration Process Through the Prism of Ontological Security Theory. The University of the Peloponnese, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net.
Felsch, M. (2020). The Ascent of Saudi Arabia to a Regional Hegemon: The Role of Institutional Power in the League of Arab States. International Studies. 57 (2), pp: 132-143.
Flemes, D. (2010). Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. Routledge
Ghasemi, A, Nasehi, M. (2021). The Competition Between Iran and Saudi Arabia: Internal Factors. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, 10(2), 205-230.
Gormandy White, M. (2021). The Middle East: List of Countries in the Region. October 11. Available at: https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/middle-east-countries.
Grumet, T. (2015). New Middle East Cold War: Saudi Arabia and Iran's Rivalry. A, M Thesis in international Relations, Josef Korbel School of International Studies. University of Denver.
Haji-Yousefi, A.M. (2009). Whose Agenda Is Served by the Idea of a Shia Crescent. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 8(1), 114-135.
Holmquist, E., Rydqvist, J. (2016). The Future of Regional Security in the Middle East: Expert Perspectives on Coming Developments. FOI-R--4251—SE, Available at: file:///C:/Users/SAYANG~1/AppData/Local/Temp/FOIR4251.pdf.
Houssay-Holzschuch, M. (2020). Hegemony. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 6, 357-362.
Huang, X. (2016). The Iranian Nuclear Issue and Regional Security: Dilemmas, Responses and the Future. Department of Political Affairs, Middle East and West Asia Division. Available at: https://hr.un.org/sites/hr.un.org/files/The%20IranNpdf.
Karen, K. (2020). Book Review: A Look Back and Forward at Turkey's "Strategic Depth" Foreign Policy Doctrine. Foreign Military Studies Office, Available at: https://community.apan.org.
Loft, P. (2023). Iran's Influence in the Middle East. UK Parliament, House of Commons Library, 9504, 1-24.
Lung, D., Ball, M. (2015). The Concept of Hegemony. November 28, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2961426.
Maher, N. (2020). Balancing Deterrence: Iran-Israel Relations in a Turbulent Middle East. Review of Economics and Political Science, 8 (3), 227-245.
Maklad, Hu. (2021). Security of the Middle East in Light of the Iranian Nuclear Deal. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 14(2), 24-38.
Ozkan, M., korut, H. (2013). Turkish Foreign Policy toward the Arab Revolution. Epiphany, 19 (3),163-176.
Özüm S, . (2013). The “Arab Spring” and Its Effect on Turkish-Iranian Relations. Rtadoğu Etütleri, 4(2), 145-164.
Perchoc, P. (2016). Turkey Since the Failed July 2016 Coup. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EN.pdf
Prys, M. (2010). Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood. International Studies Review, 12 (4), 479-504.
Raouf, H. (2019). Iranian Quest for Regional Hegemony: Motivations, Strategies and Constrains. Review of Economics and Political Science, 4(3), 242-256.
Satanakis, M., Süss, K. (2021). The Shift in Turkey’s Foreign Policy. AIES: Austria Institut für Europa-und Sicherheitspolitik. Available at: https://www.aies.at/download/2021.
Schenoni, L. (2019). Hegemony. International Studies Association. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/internationalstues.
Seren, M. (2020). Turkey’s Military Spending Trends: A Reflection of Changes in Defense Policy. Insight Turkey. 22 (3), pp:183-214.
Won Min, B. (2003). Understanding International Hegemony: A Complex Systems Approach. Journal of International and Area Studies, 10(1), 21-40.
American Strategic Studies
Volume 3, Issue 11 - Serial Number 11
Autumn 2023
September 2024
Pages 93-115

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 05 May 2024
  • Revise Date: 05 August 2024
  • Accept Date: 27 August 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics