Evaluation of the Essay on the Future of the American Empire in the Current Period from the Point of View of the Supporters of the Decline School

Document Type : Original Article

Author

PhD student of International Relations, University of Tehran, Department of Law and Political Science, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Supporters of the decline of American power have raised three main arguments regarding the decline of this country: a; America's power has declined, B; Great powers inevitably decline, P; One of the consequences of America's decline will be political instability and economic disorder in the international system. In her article in 1988, Susan Strange disagreed with the propositions of America's decline supporters and presented her arguments to refute these theories. The purpose of this article is to evaluate Strange's arguments in the current state of the international system and it intends to examine and evaluate the claims of the supporters of the decline school based on her article. Therefore, this question is raised: Is there a reasonable basis for defending America's superpower and hegemony at the current stage or can the supporters of the decline school prove their claim with more arguments? Using the process tracing method, the current research has proposed the hypothesis that although American hegemony was established after the collapse of the Eastern Bloc, but gradually and with the emergence of claimants, American power has declined. The findings of the research, while rejecting Strange's claim in different dimensions and areas, show that the European Union in the cultural dimension, Russia in the military dimension and China in the economic dimension are the most important challengers of American hegemony and in the future power will be transferred from the West to the East.

Keywords

Smiley face

References

استرنج، سوزان. (1389). آینده امپراطوری امریکا، در کتاب: دیدگاه‌هایی درباره سیاست جهان. ترجمه علیرضا طیب، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
آهویی، مهدی، حسینی، دیاکو. (1395). فول هژمونی امریکا: معنای انتقال قدرت در نظام جهانی و الزامات سیاستگذاری. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی. 2 (20)، 50-66.
بوزان، باری. (1389). ایالات متحده و قدرت‌های بزرگ. ترجمه عبدالمجدی حیدری، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
جهان‌بین، فرزاد، پرتو، فتح‌الله. (1394). سناریوهای آینده نظام بین‌الملل و جایگاه جهان اسلام. پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست. 4 (13)، 168-147.
دوبوف، ریچارد. (1383). هژمونی امریکا؛ افول مداوم، اما خطری ماندگار. چشم انداز ایران، ویژه نامه پاییز، ترجمه اردشیر عمانی، 31-21.
دهشیار، حسین، عمرانی، ابوذر. (1400). قدرت‌های بزرگ و تحولات حقوق بین‌الملل؛ با تأکید بر حقوق فضا. پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست. 10 (36)، 286-313.
رنجبر، محمد هادی، حاجی‌پور، بهمن، یزدانی، حمیدرضا. (1401). کاربرد روش ردیابی فرایند در پژوهش‌های سازمان و مدیریت. روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی. 28 (112)، 64-49.
عمرانی، ابوذر، مرادی، محمدجواد. (1401). تأثیر همه‌گیری جهانی ویروس کووید 19 بر الگوی رفتاری-تعاملی بازیگران نظام بین‌الملل بر مبنای تئوری واقع‌گرایی. سیاست کاربردی. 4 (1)، 166-141.
قنبرلو، عبدالله. (1400). عوامل گرایش امریکا به گلوبالیسم در دوره پس از جنگ جهانی دوم. مطالعات سیاست بین الملل، 1 (1)، 132-109.
کگان، رابرت. (1382). بهشت و قدرت: امریکا و اروپا در نظم نوین جهانی. ترجمه محمود عبدالله‌زاده، تهران: دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.
ماگسس، برونو. (1398). پروژه موسوم به جاده ابریشم جدید در چین و تأثیرات جهانی آن. عصر دیپلماسی. گروه خاورمیانه، 7 اردیبهشت.
محمدمیرزائی، حسن، پیرانی، شهره، نادری، مهدی. (1401). تبیین افول امریکا از منظر امام خامنه‌ای. آفاق امنیت. 15 (1)، 33-1.
موسوی شفائی، مسعود، شاپوری، مهدی. (1394). امریکا و نظام بین‌الملل: از نظم تک قطبی تا نظم فراقطبی. مطالعات راهبردی. 18 (2)، 139-165.
نعیمی، علی اصغر، میرکوشش، امیرهوشنگ، محمدزاده، علی. (1399). آینده نظم بین‌الملل در افق 2030 میلادی. مطالعات روابط بین‌الملل. 13 (52)، 222-205.
هانتینگتون، ساموئل. (1387). امریکا: ابرقدرت تنها (گذار از نظام تک قطبی-چندقطبی). ترجمه مجتبی امیری وحید، اطلاعات سیاسی-اقتصادی 13 (9-10)، 1-18.
هدایتی شهیدانی، مهدی. (1397). گذار از ساختار اقتصاد جهانی؛ رفتار اقتصادی قدرتهای بزرگ در دوره گذار. پژوهش‌های روابط بین‌الملل. 8 (2)، 122-91.
یزدانی، عنایت الله، شیخون، احسان. (1390). قدرت نرم در سیاست خارجی امریکا با تأکید بر پدیده فرهنگ. مطالعات قدرت نرم. 2 (5)، 120-95.
Acharya, A. (2020). Hegemony and Diversity in the Liberal International Order: Theory and Reality, E-International Relations, Avaliable at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/01/14.
Akçay, E.Y., Kanat, S. (2017). Carrot and Stick Approach in International Relations: An Evaluation Throughtout Turkey’s Accession Negotiations with the European Union, Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 4 (29), 415-435.
Araya, D (2022). America’s Global Dominance Is Ending: What Comes Next, October 5, Avaliable at: https://www.cigionline.org.
Barabanov, O (2023). Is It Possible to Change the Structure of International Relations?, June 6, Valdai Discussion Club, Available at: https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/is-it-possible-to-change-the-structure.
Beckley, M (2019). Why the United States Is the Only Superpower, November 21, Global Affairs, Available at: https://now.tufts.edu/2019/11/21/why-united-states-only-superpower.
Botchway, T.P., Kwarteng, A.H. (2018). Developing International Law in Challenging Times, Journal of Politics and Law; 11 (3), 52-63.
Chivvis, C.S., Geaghan-Breiner, B. (2024). Emerging Powers and the Future of American Statecraft, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, Avaliable at: https://carnegie-production-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/files/Chivvis_Emerging-Powers_11-1.pdf
Cox, M. (2007). Still the American Empire, Political Studies Review, 5 (1), 1-10.
Glassman, J. (2009). Hegemony, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Avaliable at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/getaccess/pii/B9780080449104007847/purchase.
Greenberg, J. (2018). Donald Trump Says US Spent $7 Trillion on Middle East Wars. A lot of that Money has not been Spent, May 1, Politifact, Avaliable at: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/may/01.
Gvosdev, N. (2020). Why the Pandemic Has Revived Hard-Nosed Realism, 8 Sept 2020, Avaliable at: https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com.
Haass, R.N. (2008). The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance, Foreign Affairs, 87 (3), 44-65.
Hamada, K. (1996). The Economic Consequences of a Declining Hegemon, Discussion Papers, 764, Available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/egcenter-discussion-paper-series.
Harari, Noah, Y (2020). The World After Coronavirus, Financial Times, 20 March, Available at: https://www.ft.com/content.
Harb, A. (2024). US Advocacy Groups Back Palestine Solidarity Campus Protests Amid Gaza War.  29 Apr 2024, Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/29/us-advocacy-groups-back-palestine-solidarity-campus-protests.
Hernández, F., José, B. (2013). Review of the Book: Beyond 2025: A Few Unknown Questions Regarding Us Geo-Politics, Journal of the Spanish Institute of Strategic Studies, 1, 1-4.
Huang, Q. (2020). The Pandemic and the Transformation of LiberalInternational Order, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26 (1), 1-26.
Ikenberry, J. (2018). The end of Liberal International Order?, International Affairs, 94 (1), 7-23.
Jang, C.H.C. (2017). The Hegemonic Competition Between China and the United States and the Strategic Option of South Korea, Canadian Forces Callefr, National Defence, Avaliable at: https://www.cfc.forces.gc.ca
Kasiyarno K. (2014). The ‘American’ Hegemonic Culture: Its Roots, Features and Implications to World Culture, Rubikon Journal of Transnational American Studies, 1(1), 19-31.
Kennedy, P. (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, New York, ISBN: 0-394-54674-1
Kliem, F. (2020). Opinion – Realism and the Coronavirus Crisis, 11 April, Avaliable at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/04/11.
Layne, C. (2012). This Time It's Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana, International Studies Quarterly, 56 (1), 203-213.
Milner, HV., Tingley, D. (2013). The Choice for Multilateralism: Foreign Aid and American Foreign Policy. The Review of International Organizations, 8 (3), 313-341.
Morrison, W.M. (2018). China-U.S. Trade Issues, CRS Report for Congress, No, RL33536, Avaliable at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33536.pdf.
Poletti, A., Zambernardi, L. (2021). Declining Hegemony and the Sources of Trump’s Disengagement from Multilateral Trade Governance: The Interaction Between Domestic Politics and the International Political Economy, nternational Politics, 59, 1101–1118.
Powell-Turner, J. (2018). Global Strategic Trends The Future Starts Today, Cranfield University, Avaliable at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication.
Roberts, A., Lamp, N. (2020). Is the Virus Killing Globalization? There’s No One Answer, March 15, Available at: https://www.barrons.com/articles/is-the-virus-killing-globalization-theres.
Sørensen, G., Møller, J. (2019). What can History tell us About the Future of International Relations, January 17, Oxford University Press's, Avaliable at: https://blog.oup.com/2019/01.
Sornarajah, M. (2006). Power And Justice: Third World Resistance In International Law, Singapore Year Book of International Law and Contributors, Avaliable at: http://www.commonlii.org/sg/journals/SGYrBkIntLaw/2006/4.pdf.
Speck, U (2020). Between Confrontation and Cooperation: Coronavirus and the International Order, July 6, Avaliable at: https://eu.boell.org.
Swanson, A. (2023). The Contentious U.S.-China Relationship, by the Numbers, Avaliable at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/07/business/economy/us-china-relationship-facts.html.
Tankersley, J. (2023). How the U.S. Government Amassed $31 Trillion in Debt, The New York Times. Avaliable at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/22/business/economy/federal-debt-history.html.
Tonby, O., Woetzel, J., Choi, W., Seong, J., Wang, P. (2019). Asia’s future is now,  McKinsey Global Institute, Avaliable at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights.
American Strategic Studies
Volume 3, Issue 11 - Serial Number 11
Autumn 2023
September 2024
Pages 153-182

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 December 2023
  • Revise Date: 27 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 27 August 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics